BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(6)

 TEKS ASAL

Bab 1. Seterusnya kita pergi 1.8 iaitu definisi operasional. Ini agak sukar ya. Kadangkala pelajar ini agak keliru. Operasional bermakna tentang definisi tentang kajian yang kita jalankan bukan definisi konsep. Bukanlah definisi seperti, ada contoh pelajar buat apa makna wacana satu, makna skrip satu, tekstual satu, animasi satu, cerita satu, rakyat satu, melayu satu. Itu salah ya. Kita bukan mahu definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap satu, mulalah pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan sahaja. Dia rujuk semua jenis kamus. Tidak mahu. jangan! Jadi operasional ialah tentang kajian kita. Jadi, biasa definisi operasional ini minima 2 atau pun paling maksimum 3 tentang bagaimana kita mahu menjalankan kajian ni supaya apabila pembaca baca baru faham. “Oh, ini maksud dia”. Jadi, kalau kita lihat tajuk ini kita boleh ambik satu  wacana tekstual lagi  satu skrip animasi cerita rakyat melayu. Ya, boleh. Kalai kita mahu ambil bezakan skrip animasi jadi satu skrip animasi yang tiada kaitan pula. Skrip animasi apa. Jadi kita boleh teruskan. Bagi tajuk ini kemungkinan ada dua. Tajuk yang lain mungkin ada tiga. kalau kita ambil tajuk daripada kejuruteraan contohnya,  mungkin operasional itu ada banyak kerana dia akan ada banyak pemboleh ubah didalam itu. Kalau daripada tesis sains juga begitu. Ada banyak pemboleh ubah yang membolehkan kita membuat definisi operasional supaya pemeriksa faham apa kaitan itu dalam tesis tersebut. Jika kita lihat tesis yang berbentuk ekonomi juga begitu. Kita ada banyak pembolehubah. Jadi mungkin akan lebih daripada tiga. Jadi untuk yang ini kita focus kepada dua. Ini saya beri contoh ye. Jadi, awak boleh buat  begini kemudian letak contohnya wacana tekstual. Tetapi, wacana tekstual yang awak nak buat definsi operasional ini mesti berkaitan dengan kajian dan pastikan bahawa ia  mempunyai rujukan. Ini perlu ada rujukan. Ada satu cara. Satu maknanya awak perlu buat wacana tekstual yang berkaitan dengan kajian awak, wacana tekstual yang berfokus kepada skrip animasi. Wacana tektual ini akan dianalisis menggunakan tiga elemen. Contohnya, tiga elemen ini iaitu kandungan, konteks dan andaian. Jadi wacana tekstual. Jadi menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) wacana tekstual itu apa? apa dia? apa dia?  Boleh ada rujukan dan juga 1.8.2 iaitu skrip animasi cerita rakyat melayu. Ini mestilah berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Apa yang dia huraikan serba ringkas. Skrip animasi cerita rakyat melayu terdiri daripada 20 cerita kerana dalam awak punya tesis mempunyai analisis 20 cerita. Skrip animasi ini berbentuk apa? Jadi huraikan. Mungkin skrip cerita animasi rakyat melayu ini, awak huraikan kita mahu berkaitan dengan kajian kita tapi tidak ada pula rujukan awak mahu letak. Tidak mengapa, ia boleh diterima kerana definisi yang ini memang berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Jadi ada dua cara. Satu, cara mempunyai rujukan. Ini ada rujukan. Jadi, yang kedua tiada rujukan. Maknanya awak buat huraian.  Huraian tentang wacana tekstual itu dari segi konteks tesis awak. Ini juga dari konteks kajian atau tesis awak. Keduanya boleh diterima tetapi seperti yang saya katakana sebelum ini, rujuk penyelia. Jika penyelia kata ada rujukan maka letaklah. Jika penyelia kata tidak mengapa, saya percaya bhwa jika tiada rujukan juga saya faham dan ini sebenarnya tidak perlu rujukan kerana ia berkaitan dengan kajian awak bukan kajian orang lain. Seperti yang saya katakana sebelum ini, kita ini berbeza pendapat. Berbeza sekolah. Jadi, different school of thought. Pemikiran kita berbeza. Kalau ada sejuta penyelia, kita akan ada sejuta pemikiran yg berbeza. Jadi terpulang kepada penyelia. Kalau seperti saya, jika saya tiba-tiba hari ini kata tidak perlu kerana bagi saya definisi operasional ini tentang kajian, bahagian mana awak mahu jalankan kajian. Nama pun operasional (operation) jalankan kajian. Bukan kita mahu definisi konsep. Ini tidak boleh rujuk kamus. Mengapa mahu rujuk kamus? Jangan! Harus ada rujuk daripada kajian-kajian bukan dari kamus. Jangan tulis “Menurut kamus Dewan Bahasa edisi ke-4 wacana tekstual…”. Tidak boleh! Itu kita tahu. Janganlah rujuk kamus. Jadi kita rujuk, rujukan kajian-kajian yang lain. Seperti saya kata, satu boleh rujukan, kedua tiada rujukan. Ia boleh diterima dan terpulang kepada penyelia masing-masing. Jadi sekarang ini, kalau kita lihat, setelah habis definsi operasional, kita ada 1.9 iaitu organisasi kajian. Organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada individu, pelajar atau penyelia. Ini biasanya, saya akan minta pelajar PhD letak organisasi kajian. Kadangkala pelajar master juga boleh tetapi jika dia tidak letak juga tidak mengapa.  Ini boleh pilih. Organisasi kajian ini dibuat dalam bentuk perenggan. Jadi, perenggan satu apa ada dalam bab 1. Kemudian perenggan satu apa ada dalam bab 2. Ini organisasi kita. Kita mahu membuat secara ringkas. Apabila penyelia baca, “Oh, bab ini ada ini. Bab 2 ada ini”. Penyusunan tesis kita secara teratur. Jadi perenggan tiga ringkas sahaj kerana seperti saya kata sebelum ini. Tiap bab ada pengenalan. Tetapi didalam organisasi kajian ini kita harus nyatakan secara ringkas kandungan dalam tiap-tiap perenggan. Jadi untuk pelajar PhD, saya wajibkan suapay dia sendiri boleh memahami kandungan tiap-tiap bab. Jadi untuk pelajar master, bacelor dan diploma juga tiada masalah jika mahu buat. Pokoknya, terpulang kepada penyelia dan akhir sekali 1.10.  Baru masuk keseimpulan. Semua bab, seperti saya katakan tadi semua bab mesti ada kesimpualan. Tidak boleh tiada kesimpulan Kita mahu simpulkan apa yang ada didalam bab tersebut. Jadi, saya mendapati ada tesis yang tiada kesimpulan. Tergantung sahaja. Bila tergantung, tiba-tiba masuk bab 2. Jadi, tiada kesinambungan bab 1 dengan bab 2 seperti bab 1 itu ada satu bab lain yang menjadi entity lain. Tiada kaitan langsung dengan bab 2. Jadi perlu ada kesimpulan. Kesimpulan ini, kita mesti simpulkan apa yang ada didalam bab 1 dan juga ingat bahawa ayat akhir kita mesti dikaitkan dengan bab seterusnya. Bab seterusnya iaitu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian blabla. Jadi kita boleh dapati kesinambungan antara bab 1 dan bab 2. Jadi serupa juga seperti saya terangkan dalam bab-bab lain. Dalam bab kesimpulan, mesti akhir-akhir kita nyatakan kandungan dalam bab seterusnya. Jadi penting ada kesimpulan. Tapi, seperti saya katakan, ada penyelia kata tidak perlu simpulkan. Mungkin itu dia punya pemikiran yang berbza. Macam saya kata different school of thought. Jadi bila berbeza tidak mengapa. Kita redha dan kita terima. Okay, kita dah habis bab 1. Lupa nak cakap. Halaman. “berapa halaman bab 1 ye prof?”. Ok, bab 1 ini biasanya lebih kurang 8 hingga 10 sahaja. Ini yang saya katakan ada pelajar letak 30. Tahu kenapa jadi 30? Bahagian masalah kajian itu pun sudah 15 halaman. Kalau masalah kajian ada 30 halaman, seolah-olah dia buat sorotan kajian. Itu sudah salah sebab masalah kajian kita ambil yang betul-betul penting masukkan dalam itu sedangkan kita tahu dalam bab 2 memang banyak ada jurang disitu. Jadi, itu semua juga ada masalah jadi kita ambil yang penting sahaja. Itu salah. Dia jadi sama seperti sorotan kajian. ktif kajian. Kalau objektif ada dua, dua perenggan masalah kajian. Objektif ada tiga, jadi tiga perenggan masalah kajian.  Tapi perlu padat dalam itu walaupun ringkas. Kaitkan pula dengan objektif. Tapi yang selebihnya sorotan-sorotan ataupun jurang penyelidikan yang lain ada masalah alam bab 2. Jadi pelajar boleh rujuk daripada situ. Paling lebih pun 12 jangan kurang daripada 8. Tapi jangan lebih daripada 15 halaman. Tidak boleh. Kita takut dia jadi macam bab 2. Jadi, kita ingat ya dalam bab 1 ini.

 

TEKS INGGERIS

Chapter 1. Next we go 1.8 which is the operational definition. This is a bit difficult. Sometimes these students are a bit confused. Operational means the definition of the study we are conducting is not the definition of a concept. It is no such definition, there are examples of what the students create a discourse, a script meaning, textual one, the animation, the story, the people one, wilt one. That's wrong. We do not want that definition. If the definition of each one, start students will refer to the hall dictionary only. He referred to all types of dictionaries. Do not want. Don't! So operational is about our study. So, usually this operational definition is a minimum of 2 or even a maximum of 3 on how we want to conduct this study so that when the reader reads only understand. "Oh, this is what he means". So, if we look at this topic we can take a more textual discourse of Malay folklore animation scripts. Yes can. If we want to differentiate the animated script into an unrelated animated script. What animated script. So we can move on. For this title there are probably two. Other titles may have three. if we take a title from engineering for example, maybe the operational has a lot because he will have a lot of variables in it. If it is from a science thesis, it is the same. There are many variables that allow us to make an operational definition so that the examiner understands what the relevance is in the thesis. If we look at the thesis in the form of economics as well. We have a lot of variables. So there will probably be more than three. So for this one we focus on two. Here I give you an example. So, you can do this then put for example textual discourse. But, the textual discourse you want to make this operational definition must be relevant to the study and make sure that it has a reference. This needs to be a reference. There is a way. One meaning you need to create a textual discourse related to your study, a textual discourse that focuses on animated scripts. This textual discourse will be analyzed using three elements. For example, these three elements are content, context and assumptions. So textual discourse. So according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) what is textual discourse? what is it? what is it? There can also reference and 1.8.2 of animation script Malay folklore. This must be related to your study. What he described briefly. Malay folklore animation script consists of 20 stories because the body has the thesis has analyzed 20 stories. What does this animated script look like? So describe. Maybe script animated story of this Malayan, you want to describe our connection with our study but no reference body also wants to park. It doesn't matter, it is acceptable because this definition is indeed related to your study. So there are two ways. One, how to have a reference. This is a reference. So, the second one has no reference. That means you make a description. A description of the textual discourse in terms of the context of your thesis. This is also from the context of your study or thesis. Both are acceptable but as I said before, consult a supervisor. If the supervisor says there is a reference then place it. If the supervisor says it's okay, I believe that if there is no reference, I also understand and this actually does not need a reference because it is related to your study and not someone else's study. As I said before, we have different opinions. Different schools. So, different school of thought. Our thinking is different. If there are a million supervisors, we will have a million different thoughts. So it is up to the supervisor. If like me, if I suddenly today say it is not necessary because for me this operational definition of study, which part do you want to conduct the study. The name is also operational (operation) conduct a study. Not that we want a definition of a concept. This does not refer to the dictionary. Why refer to a dictionary? Don't! There should be references from studies not from dictionaries. Do not write "According to the dictionary of the 4th edition of the Language Board tekst textual discourse…". No way! That we know. Do not refer to the dictionary. So we refer, reference other studies. Like I said, one can be a reference, the second has no reference. It is acceptable and up to the respective supervisor. So now, if we look, after finishing the operational definition, we have 1.9 which is the study organization. The organization of this study is actually up to the individual, student or supervisor. This is usually, I will ask PhD students to place the study organization. Sometimes a master student can too but if he does not place it is also okay. This is optional. The organization of this study is made in the form of paragraphs. So, paragraph one is in chapter 1. Then paragraph one is in chapter 2. This is our organization. We want to make it brief. When the supervisor read, “Oh, this chapter has this. Chapter 2 is here ”. Regular preparation of our theses. So paragraph three is short because as I said before. Each chapter has an introduction. But in the organization of this study we should state briefly the content in each paragraph. So for PhD students, I am obliged that he himself can understand the content of each chapter. So for master, bachelor and diploma students there is also no problem if you want to do. Basically, it is up to the supervisor and finally 1.10. Just came to the conclusion. All chapters, as I said earlier all chapters must have conclusions. There can be no conclusion We want to conclude what is in the chapter. So, I found there was a thesis that had no conclusions. Depends only. When hanging, suddenly enters chapter 2. So, there is no continuation of chapter 1 with chapter 2 as chapter 1 there is another chapter that becomes another entity. It has nothing to do with chapter 2. So there needs to be a conclusion. In conclusion, we must summarize what is in chapter 1 and also remember that our final sentence must be linked to the next chapter. The next chapter which is chapter 2 will discuss the highlights of the blabla study. So we can find continuity between chapter 1 and chapter 2. So similar as I explain in other chapters. In the conclusion chapter, we must finally state the content in the next chapter. So it is important to have a conclusion. But, as I said, some supervisors say there is no need to conclude. Maybe he has different thoughts. Like I said different school of thought. So when different it does not matter. We are satisfied and we accept. Okay, we're done with chapter 1. I forgot to talk. Page. "How many pages of chapter 1 ye prof?". Okay, this chapter 1 is usually about 8 to 10 only. This is what I said there are 30 students. Know why so 30? The problem section of the study is already 15 pages. If the study problem has 30 pages, it is as if he is making a study highlight. That is wrong because the problem of the study we take is really important to include in it while we know in chapter 2 there are many gaps there. So, it all has problems too so we take only the important ones. That's wrong. He became the same as the study highlights. ktif study. If the objective is two, two paragraphs of the study problem. There are three objectives, so three paragraphs of the study problem. But it needs to be solid in that even simple. Relate it to the objective. But the rest of the highlights or other research gaps have environmental problems chapter 2. So students can refer from there. At least 12 should not be less than 8. But not more than 15 pages. No way. We are afraid he will be like chapter 2. So, we remember yes in this chapter 1.

RUJUKAN: Youtube Channel Prof. Dr Normaliza - https://youtu.be/6bANk-CrrhI

BUKTI SUBSCRIBE YOUTUBE:

KEHADIRAN: